Deconvolution Methods in ZEN
|
Method |
Reference |
Settings |
Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Nearest Neighbor |
K. Castleman, “Digital image processing”, Prentice Hall 1997 |
Algorithm (default): Nearest Neighbor |
Ad-hoc “2D de-blurring algorithm” focuses on subtraction of out of focus blur. |
|
Regularized Inverse also known as: Linear Least Squares |
For zero order g-difference: Schaefer et al. (2001) |
Algorithm (default): Regularized Inverse Filter Advanced settings > Regularization: Zero order |
Uses difference of observation and estimate as regularization term. |
|
Regularized Inverse also known as: Linear Least Squares |
For first order regularization, or Good’s roughness: Verveer et al. (1997) |
Algorithm: Regularized Inverse Advanced settings > Regularization: First order |
Uses Good’s roughness first derivative of estimate as regularization term. |
|
Regularized Inverse also known as: Linear Least Squares In conjunction with structured illumination microscopy (ApoTome) |
Schaefer et al. (2006) Schaefer et al. (tbs) |
Algorithm: Regularized Inverse Advanced settings > Regularization: Zero/First order |
Patented method for maximum exploitation of ApoTome raw images. |
|
Fast Iterative Also known as: Meinel Algorithm Gold Meinel |
Meinel (1986) |
Algorithm (default): Fast Iterative Advanced settings > Likelihood: Poisson (Meinel) |
Classic, non-regularized Meinel algorithm. |
|
Fast Iterative Meinel Algorithm + Regularization: |
Meinel (1986), For zero order g-difference: Schaefer et al. (2001) |
Algorithm: Fast Iterative Advanced settings: - Likelihood: Poisson (Meinel) - Regularization: Zero order |
Regularized Meinel algorithm using g-difference (difference of observation and estimate) term. |
|
Fast Iterative Meinel Algorithm + |
Meinel (1986), Biggs (1998) |
Algorithm: Fast Iterative Advanced settings: - Likelihood: Poisson (Meinel) - Regularization: None/Zero order - Optimization: Numerical Gradient |
Meinel algorithm using a numerical gradient estimator as proposed by D. Biggs. |
|
Fast Iterative Also known as: Richardson Lucy (RL) Algorithm |
Richardson (1972) Lucy (1974) |
Algorithm: Fast Iterative Advanced settings > Likelihood: Poisson (Richardson, Lucy) |
Classic, original non-regularized Richardson Lucy algorithm. May need many more iterations than any other algorithm. |
|
Fast Iterative Also known as: Richardson Lucy Algorithm + |
Richardson (1972) Lucy (1974) Biggs (1998) |
Algorithm: Fast Iterative Advanced settings: - Likelihood: Poisson (Richardson, Lucy) - Optimization: Numerical Gradient |
Classic, original non-regularized Richardson Lucy algorithm. Improved rate of convergence. About a factor of 10 faster than RL using a numerical gradient estimator as proposed by D. Biggs. |
|
Constrained Iterative |
Verveer et al. (1997) Schaefer et al. (2001) |
Algorithm (default): Constrained Iterative Advanced settings: - Likelihood: Poisson - Regularization: Zero order |
Generic conjugate gradient restoration using squared estimate to impose positivity. Uses difference of observation and estimate as regularization term. |
|
Constrained Iterative |
Verveer et al. (1997) Schaefer et al. (2001) |
Algorithm: Constrained Iterative Advanced settings: - Likelihood: Poisson - Regularization: First order |
Generic conjugate gradient restoration using squared estimate to impose positivity. Uses Good’s roughness derivative operator as regularization term. |
|
Constrained Iterative |
Tikhonov (1977) Verveer et al. (1997) Schaefer et al. (2001) |
Algorithm: Constrained Iterative Advanced settings: - Likelihood: Poisson - Regularization: Second order |
Generic conjugate gradient restoration using squared estimate to impose positivity. Uses Tikhonov Miller Phillips second derivative operator as regularization term. |
|
Constrained Iterative |
Verveer et al. (1997) Schaefer et al. (2001) |
Algorithm: Constrained Iterative Advanced settings: - Likelihood: Gauss - Regularization: Zero order |
Generic conjugate gradient restoration using squared estimate to impose positivity. Uses difference of observation and estimate as regularization term. |
|
Constrained Iterative |
Verveer et al. (1997) Schaefer et al. (2001) |
Algorithm: Constrained Iterative Advanced settings: - Likelihood: Gauss - Regularization: First order |
Generic conjugate gradient restoration using squared estimate to impose positivity. Uses Good’s roughness derivative operator as regularization term. |
|
Constrained Iterative Also known as: ICTM Iterative Constrained Tikhonov Miller |
van der Voort et al. (1995) Verveer et al. (1997) Schaefer et al. (2001) |
Algorithm: Constrained Iterative Advanced settings: - Likelihood: Gauss - Regularization: Second order |
Generic conjugate gradient restoration using squared estimate to impose positivity. Uses Tikhonov Miller Phillips second derivative operator as regularization term. |
|
Constrained Iterative |
Verveer et al. (1997) Schaefer et al. (2001) |
Algorithm: Constrained Iterative Advanced settings: - Likelihood: Poisson/Gauss - Regularization: 0/1/2nd order - Optimization: Line search/Analytical |
Generic conjugate gradient restoration using squared estimate to impose positivity. Default for optimization is the fast analytical (Newton Raphson) method. Line search may be more accurate but is also much slower. |
Bibliography
Schaefer, L.H., Schuster, D. & Herz, H. Generalized accelerated maximum likelihood based image restoration approach applied to three-dimensional fluorescence microscopy, Journal of Microscopy, 2004 (2001), Pt. 2, 99-107 (PubMed).
Verveer, P.J. & Jovin, T.M. (1997) Efficient superresolution restoration algorithms using maximum a posteriori estimations with application to fluorescence microscopy. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 14, 1696-1706.
Meinel E.S., Origins of linear and nonlinear recursive restoration algorithms, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A., 1986, 3 (6): 787-799.
Biggs, D.S.C. 1998. Accelerated Iterative Blind Deconvolution. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Schaefer, L.H. & Schuster, D. Structured illumination microscopy: improved spatial resolution using regularized inverse filtering, Proceedings of the FOM 2006, Perth, Australia.
Lucy L.B., An iterative technique for the rectification of observed distributions, Astron. J., 1974, 79: 745-754.
Richardson W.H., Bayesian-based iterative method of image restoration, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 1972, 62 (6): 55-59.
van der Voort, H. T. M. and Strasters, K. C. (1995) Restoration of confocal images for quantitative image analysis. J. Microsc., 178, 165–181.
Tikhonov, A.N. & Arsenin, V.Y. (1977) Solutions of Ill Posed Problems. Wiley, New York.